Vitalik: The key to Ethereum's long-term sustainable development lies in protocol simplicity and a "garbage collection" mechanism
BlockBeats News, January 18th, Ethereum founder Vitalik posted, stating, "An important aspect of 'trustlessness,' 'escape-hatch-freeness,' and 'sovereignty,' which has long been underestimated, is the simplicity of the protocol. Even if a protocol is super decentralized, with hundreds of thousands of nodes, and has 49% Byzantine fault tolerance, where nodes use quantum-secure peerda and stark to fully validate everything, but if the protocol is a clumsy mess composed of hundreds of thousands of lines of code and five forms of cryptic doctorate-level cryptography, ultimately the protocol will fail to pass all three tests: not fully trustless, not fully sovereign, and not very secure."
One concern I have about Ethereum protocol development is that we may be too eager to add new features to meet specific needs, even if these features make the protocol bloated, or introduce entirely new interactive components or complex cryptographic technologies as key dependencies. This may bring short-term feature upgrades, but it will severely compromise the protocol's long-term sovereignty. The core issue is that if we measure protocol changes based on "how much change to the existing protocol," then to maintain backward compatibility, adding functions will far outnumber removing functions, and the protocol will inevitably become bloated over time. To address this issue, Ethereum's development process needs a clear "simplify" / "garbage collection" mechanism.
We hope that client developers will no longer have to deal with all old versions of the Ethereum protocol. This can be left to older version clients running in Docker containers to handle. In the long run, I hope that Ethereum's pace of change will slow down. I think, for various reasons, this is ultimately inevitable. The initial fifteen years should be seen as a growth stage, where we explored many ideas and observed which ones were effective, which were useful, and which were not. We should strive to prevent those useless parts from becoming a permanent drag on the Ethereum protocol."
You may also like

Polymarket vs. Kalshi: The Full Meme War Timeline

Consensus Check: What Consensus Was Born at the 2026 First Conference?

Resigned in Less Than a Year of Taking Office, Why Did Yet Another Key Figure at the Ethereum Foundation Depart?

Russian-Ukrainian War Prediction Market Analysis Report

Ethereum Foundation Executive Director Resigns, Coinbase Rating Downgrade: What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Who's at the CFTC Table? A Rebalancing of American Fintech Discourse
AI Trading vs Human Crypto Traders: $10,000 Live Trading Battle Results in Munich, Germany (WEEX Hackathon 2026)
Discover how AI trading outperformed human traders in WEEX's live Munich showdown. Learn 3 key strategies from the battle and why AI is changing crypto trading.
Elon Musk's X Money vs. Crypto's Synthetic Dollars: Who Wins the Future of Money?
How do Synthetic Dollars work? This guide explains their strategies, benefits over traditional stablecoins like USDT, and risks every crypto trader must know.

The Israeli military is hunting a mole on Polymarket

Q4 $667M Net Loss: Coinbase Earnings Report Foreshadows Challenging 2026 for Crypto Industry?

BlackRock Buying UNI, What's the Catch?

Lost in Hong Kong

Gold Plunges Over 4%, Silver Crashes 11%, Stock Market Plummet Triggers Precious Metals Algorithmic Selling Pressure?

Coinbase and Solana make successive moves, Agent economy to become the next big narrative

Aave DAO Wins, But the Game Is Not Over

Coinbase Earnings Call, Latest Developments in Aave Tokenomics Debate, What's Trending in the Global Crypto Community Today?

ICE, the parent company of the NYSE, Goes All In: Index Futures Contracts and Sentiment Prediction Market Tool
