Vitalik Discusses Ethereum Scaling Path, Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket, What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?
Publication Date: February 6, 2025
Author: BlockBeats Editorial Team
Over the past 24 hours, the crypto market has shown a complex development trend in multiple dimensions. The mainstream discussion focused on market confidence decline, talent outflow, and narrative fatigue-driven outlook discussions. Meanwhile, the Bitcoin payment network faced an attack once again highlighting the risks of centralized infrastructure. In terms of ecosystem development, Ethereum continued to advance its technology roadmap around privacy and scalability, privacy-focused L2 narratives heated up, cross-chain settlement infrastructure received additional capital, and the underlying structure of on-chain financial applications is still evolving.
1. Mainstream Discussion
1. Crypto Market Outlook Discussion
The crypto market remains in a state of high uncertainty, with several industry insiders recently expressing concerns about the industry's outlook.
Balaji believes that despite intense short-term price fluctuations, in the long term, the crypto world will transition from being "rule-driven" to "code-driven," emphasizing the importance of internet capitalism and privacy. Altan Tutar listed a series of negative signals, including Kyle Samani of Multicoin exiting, Nader Dabit shifting to an AI startup, and Vitalik admitting that the Layer 2 roadmap has not been fully successful, pointing out that the industry seems to be losing a "common enemy" that can unite consensus.
Linda Xie revealed that many people she respects have advised her to leave the crypto industry and move to the AI or robotics track. Cami predicted that the market will experience severe turbulence in the next three months, with rational funds shifting to projects with sustainable cash flows or choosing to exit entirely, noting that three key figures have already exited in the past 48 hours.
Flood analyzed from a trading perspective, suggesting that this round of sell-off may involve sovereign wealth funds reducing their holdings, exchanges experiencing liquidations or high-leverage chain reactions. Ignas believes that crypto natives are actively selling off due to concerns about a "1929-style crash," forming an internal negative feedback loop. Miya even bluntly stated that "crypto is over," the VC system is slowly declining, LP commitments remain low, several institutions have shifted to the AI and robotics track, and called for attention to "valuable tokens" from Web2 startups. Arthur pointed out that this cycle is not friendly to long-term investors, but traders are making substantial profits; from a longer-term perspective, continued investor exits may lead to gradually depleting liquidity.
Community reactions are visibly divided. On one hand, many agree with the industry's weakness assessment. Raychi sarcastically remarked, "Price is irrelevant, but the portfolio has collapsed," AdimKarp questioned the accuracy of Balaji's past predictions, Anatoly Karlin warned that once the rule order collapses, what will be reinforced is state power rather than the crypto system. Bruno Skvorc criticized the industry for being filled with "junk projects" lacking true decentralization, calling for a stop to building meaningless L2 solutions. LilMoonLambo believes that crypto should maintain its countercultural nature rather than cater to mainstream politics.
On the other hand, there are also relatively positive voices. Mert supports the narrative of "Capitalism 2.0," while THORChain emphasizes that the real DEX demand still exists. Shamdoo and Mayhem question Samani's judgment, and Lily Liu suggests shifting the focus from the protocol layer to the application layer. Overall, the discussion focuses on talent drain, narrative fatigue, and opportunity cost; a few believe that "purging" may foster renewal, but the majority of sentiment still leans towards discouragement and exit.
2. Strike Bitcoin Payment Network Reportedly Subject to DDoS Attack
Strike founder Jack Mallers confirmed that the company's Bitcoin payment network experienced a DDoS attack, causing over 2.5 million global users to be unable to send or receive BTC for approximately 183 minutes. Simon Dixon cautioned users to avoid borrowing Bitcoin and hinted that the potential offline of some borrowing parties could pose liquidation risks. However, Mallers later clarified that no liquidations occurred during the incident.
The event sparked mockery of Bitcoin's "future financial infrastructure" reliability. Accredited Financial Survivor pointed out that the attack did not impact the Bitcoin protocol itself; John Tuld questioned whether the timing of the attack was meant to mask solvency issues. Victor Resto emphasized that centralized services are not the future, CalmTraders believed that Bitcoin is neither the future of finance nor capable of serving as a store of value.
Urban Arson criticized the Lightning Network as fundamentally an IOU network, Tyrannysaurusrekt and Paolo Aga took the opportunity to promote BCH as a true peer-to-peer cash solution. LC clarified that the issue lies with Lightning rather than Bitcoin itself and recommended Kaspa's "zero downtime" feature. RogeR suggested that the attack and market sell-off were synchronously timed, discussing an overall shift towards centralized risk exposure and alternative chain narratives.
3. Circle Announces Partnership with Polymarket
Circle announced a partnership with the world's largest prediction market, Polymarket, to drive the evolution of on-chain financial market infrastructure, focusing on stablecoin transparency, settlement reliability, and reducing friction costs. Polymarket will migrate from Polygon's bridged USDC (USDC.e) to Circle's native USDC, enabling 1:1 direct USD redemption, thereby enhancing capital efficiency, scalability, and system reliability.
The community's overall response has been positive. 0xWeiler emphasized the elimination of bridging risks, Peter Schroeder noted the symbolic significance of the partnership, Grazka and d1namit expressed excitement. Insight.eth viewed it as a significant signal of on-chain market maturity, Campbell inquired about its actual business impact, Buy The Dip Bro is optimistic about the potential boost to CRCL's stock price. ME Group further elaborated on the partnership details, KimcĦi called for support for USDC on Hedera, and LINK-BULL ennes pointed out that both are Chainlink ecosystem partners. The overall atmosphere is optimistic, but there are also a few voices expressing concerns about regulatory freeze risks.
4. Vitalik on Ethereum Scaling Pathway
Vitalik Buterin has released an article discussing the possibility of achieving a 1000x extension of Ethereum L1 through a "new form of state." He points out that while execution and data layer scaling are relatively feasible, state scaling is more challenging. He suggests introducing a new form of state that has lower costs but limited functionality while gently scaling the existing state. High-value objects (such as user accounts, DeFi contracts) should remain in the existing state tree, while ERC20 balances, NFTs, and the like can be migrated to the new state structure.
In further discussions, Vitalik criticizes the trend of excessive replication of EVM chains and L1, calling for true innovation in directions such as privacy, application-specific efficiency, and ultra-low latency. He emphasizes that the essence of being "connected to Ethereum" should align with the actual integration and advises against a one-size-fits-all L2 bridging approach. He proposes that applications like prediction markets may be better suited for an application chain architecture: issuance and settlement on L1 with transactions processed on a rollup-based system.
The discussion quickly heats up. Keone Hon suggests starting with database optimization and gas pricing mechanisms to incentivize state destruction. Poseidon believes that addressing price extension issues should take precedence, while Markus.ai and Kaspa Hub take the opportunity to promote ICP and Kaspa as alternative solutions. Observe sees Vitalik's statement as a bullish signal, and Quai Network promotes its own tree-chain structure.
Critical voices have also emerged, with Tony Montana accusing developers of token dumping. Binji interprets this as a manifestation of "trust gradient" and encourages more honest architecture choices. Miralib, Z, and others continue to emphasize that Kaspa and ICP have already achieved similar goals in practice. The overall discussion gradually evolves into a showcase of competitive public chains, reflecting both disappointment in Ethereum's limitations that have been publicly acknowledged and a lingering expectation of innovation space.
2. Mainstream Ecosystem Dynamics
1. Ethereum Privacy L2 Narrative Heating Up
Payy_link announced it will migrate from a standalone chain to an Ethereum-based privacy-focused L2, emphasizing a "privacy-first" banking-grade on-chain experience. The project has garnered support from Robot Ventures, 6th Man Ventures, dba_crypto, and Protocol Labs. It aims to build on-chain banking services with stablecoins at its core, allowing users to directly download and use the app.
David Hoffman highlights that this decision came just one day after Vitalik announced that rollups are no longer seen as a "centralizing stopgap solution," further showcasing Ethereum's strong network effects. Despite Vitalik's recent emphasis on the importance of L1 scaling, he also clearly states that L2 still holds irreplaceable value in specialized scenarios.
In addition to the Payy_link, privacy-focused L2 projects such as Aztec Network, Nillion, 0xMiden, COTI Network, and others are also making progress. At the same time, an institutional privacy working group is discussing the possibility of the banking system transitioning to the Ethereum L2, believing that "cryptographic privacy" is superior to traditional policy privacy in terms of mathematical verifiability. The Confidential Layer has already integrated Base, providing users with instant privacy access capabilities.
Furthermore, Vitalik has also released the Ethereum L1 privacy roadmap, covering on-chain payment privacy, partially anonymous application activity, RPC call privacy, and network layer anonymity, signaling Ethereum's systematic enhancement of privacy capabilities.
The community as a whole holds a highly positive view of Ethereum's progress in the privacy field. rip.eth believes that there is no need to build another privacy-focused alt-L1, as Ethereum is poised to become the infrastructure for "default privacy" and its scale is so large that it is difficult to completely block. Leo Lanza emphasizes that while L2 inherits L1 security, it also provides a practical path for institutions to adopt "mathematical privacy" rather than "policy privacy."
XT Exchange summarizes Vitalik's privacy roadmap, aiming to achieve default private transfers and resilience to threats. Master Mute predicts that privacy will become a long-term trend, but having too many independent privacy chains may not be necessary, as Ethereum may integrate privacy capabilities. mert analogizes privacy design with performance trade-offs to the route differences between SOL and ETH.
AminCad clarifies a misunderstanding of Vitalik's views, emphasizing that its core support remains for L2 specialization, with the future form being "one L1 (Ethereum) + multiple L2s." MIKS describes the current moment as "extremely unusual," while GPT360 believes that the Ethereum narrative still maintains resilience. Streamr highlights the importance of decentralized ordering to avoid censorship risks.
There have also been a few voices of skepticism, such as Brahddah.eth questioning Aztec's privacy depiction or taking the opportunity to promote competing chains like ICP. Overall, market sentiment leans towards optimism, suggesting that privacy L2 is strengthening the depth and applicability of the Ethereum ecosystem.
2. Relay Completes $17 Million Series B Funding
Relay Protocol has announced the completion of a $17 million Series B funding round led by Archetype and USV, and simultaneously launched the Relay Chain—a layer 2 infrastructure designed for "instant cross-chain settlement," supporting instant transfers of any asset on any chain.
So far, Relay has supported over 85 blockchains, processed over 100 million transactions, with a total transaction volume of $20 billion. The core focus of this round of funding is to address on-chain asset fragmentation, allowing users to complete asset transfers without perceiving inter-chain complexity.
Previously, Relay (formerly known as Reservoir) completed a $14 million Series A funding in February 2025, focusing on a unified cross-chain token trading experience. Similar projects in this direction include Analog, which raised $16 million in 2024, focusing on cross-chain communication infrastructure.
The community response has been enthusiastic. Leading products such as MoonPay, MetaMask, Phantom, among others, have congratulated the milestone, emphasizing its significance for cross-chain infrastructure. Max Segall and deployer have expressed a clear bullish sentiment.
crickhitchens has raised concerns about Relay's Data Availability (DA) choices and recommended Celestia as a potential solution. Anon Vee revisited their Series A coverage, stating that Relay's bridging solution is highly reliable. bigchops believes this is an "long-awaited but highly effective" announcement, ALVIN speculates that the cross-chain payment landscape may undergo significant changes as a result. Fundraising Digest has systematically organized the funding structure and background.
While the overall sentiment is leaning towards excitement, there have also been discussions focusing on technical details, such as DA scheme choices and long-term scalability. However, overall, Relay is widely seen as one of the key players addressing cross-chain fragmentation.
You may also like

Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 9th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report

"2.5 Dip" Real Reason: Wall Street Deleveraging Induced Overreaction

Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?

Cryptocurrency prices in the dumps, but the prediction market is going wild?
Decoding Strategy’s Latest Financial Report: After a $12.4 Billion Loss, How Long Can the Bitcoin Flywheel Keep Spinning?
When earnings reports become electrocardiograms of Bitcoin’s price, Strategy is not merely a company—it’s an experiment testing whether faith can overcome gravity.

Discover How to Participate in Staking
Staking is a digital asset yield product launched by the WEEX platform. By subscribing to Staking products, users can stake their idle digital assets and earn corresponding Staking rewards.

WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Rules & Guidelines
This article explains the rules, requirements, and prize structure for the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Finals, where finalists compete using AI-driven trading strategies under real market conditions.

From 0 to $1 Million: Five Steps to Outperform the Market Through Wallet Tracking

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk
Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:
To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:
Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:
(I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.
The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.
A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.
(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.
Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.
(III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.
(IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.
(6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.
(7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.
(8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.
(IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.
(X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.
(XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.
(XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.
(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.
(XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.
(15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.
(16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.
(17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.
(18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.
(19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.
This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.

Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started
Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook
Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

Believing in the Capital Markets - The Essence and Core Value of Cryptocurrency

Polymarket's 'Weatherman': Predict Temperature, Win Million-Dollar Payout
$15K+ Profits: The 4 AI Trading Secrets WEEX Hackathon Prelim Winners Used to Dominate Volatile Crypto Markets
How WEEX Hackathon's top AI trading strategies made $15K+ in crypto markets: 4 proven rules for ETH/BTC trading, market structure analysis, and risk management in volatile conditions.

A nearly 20% one-day plunge, how long has it been since you last saw a $60,000 Bitcoin?
Key Market Information Discrepancy on February 9th - A Must-See! | Alpha Morning Report
"2.5 Dip" Real Reason: Wall Street Deleveraging Induced Overreaction
Kyle's review of Hyperliquid sparks controversy, Solitude Bank officially opens, what are the overseas crypto communities talking about today?
Cryptocurrency prices in the dumps, but the prediction market is going wild?
Decoding Strategy’s Latest Financial Report: After a $12.4 Billion Loss, How Long Can the Bitcoin Flywheel Keep Spinning?
When earnings reports become electrocardiograms of Bitcoin’s price, Strategy is not merely a company—it’s an experiment testing whether faith can overcome gravity.
Discover How to Participate in Staking
Staking is a digital asset yield product launched by the WEEX platform. By subscribing to Staking products, users can stake their idle digital assets and earn corresponding Staking rewards.