a16z: Where Did the U.S. Government's Crypto Crackdown Come From? Which Agencies Are Involved?
Original Article Title: Debanking: What you need to know
Original Source: a16z crypto
Original Translation: 0xjs@, Golden Finance
a16z Co-Founder Marc Andreessen revealed on the November 28 Joe Rogan podcast that 30 tech founders had their bank accounts closed by US banks due to their involvement with crypto. In response, on December 6, a16z crypto published an op-ed discussing "Debanking: What you need to know." The translation by 0xjs@ Golden Finance is as follows:
「Debanking」 has been happening behind the scenes for years but has now become a public discussion topic once again. Many individuals, policymakers, companies, and the most important entrepreneurs for US innovation have spoken out on this issue. As the cryptocurrency industry and specific institutions have repeatedly appeared in this discussion, here is a brief explanation of this phenomenon to help distinguish signal from noise.
But first, what is 「debanking」?
In essence, debanking refers to law-abiding individuals or entities unexpectedly losing their banking relationships, or even being kicked out of the banking system.
Debanking is different from a situation where an entity loses banking services due to being suspected or confirmed of engaging in fraud, money laundering, or other illegal activities.
Debanking can occur without any apparent investigation, detailed explanation, or prior notice, without giving the entity enough time to transfer funds. Most importantly: there is no due process, appeal process, or other recourse.
Why is this important?
We have established fair banking rules, attempting to ensure that people are not discriminated against based on age, gender, marital status, nationality, race, religion, etc. However, these rules do not restrict banks (or their regulators) from arbitrarily denying or revoking someone's banking service rights.
Thus, debanking can be used by specific political actors/institutions as a tool or weapon, systematically employed without due process to target individuals or industries. Imagine if the government decided who could or could not access electricity solely based on political stance or some arbitrary reason... without explanation, investigation, notice, or providing remedies. Debanking is precisely that kind of scenario.
Why Debanking?
Not all bank closures are considered "debanking." Banks can close a customer's account for various reasons, including if they believe the customer is engaged in suspicious activities. Banks may also choose to proactively reduce regulatory compliance costs and workload by limiting exposure to certain individuals, industries, or business models.
However, it is not this legitimate activity that has raised concerns about debanking. Instead, many debanking concerns stem from reports of regulatory agencies abusing their power, pressuring banks to cancel customers in certain industries or those associated with political factions or interests disliked by the political establishment. This allows these regulatory agencies to wield power over industries, even though Congress has never authorized such power.
Banks often acquiesce to this pressure as they do not wish to conflict with regulators. Many banks also do not wish to deal with compliance issues, meaning additional scrutiny imposed by bank regulators for non-compliance.
Where Did "Operation Choke Point" Come From?
In 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice was found to have initiated an investigation into fraud and money laundering by certain businesses, a policy move of the President's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force. This marked a shift in government strategy: instead of targeting individual companies' wrongdoing, the government issued subpoenas to banks and payment processors requesting information on their customers engaged in high-risk or politically unfavorable yet legal businesses.
In other words, the government was using regulatory power unjustly to "choke off" financial service channels and close accounts, with the aim of stifling enterprises in industries the government did not favor (as observed by leaders of the American Bankers Association and the Financial Services Roundtable at the time). In 2014, Frank Keating (former President and CEO of the American Bankers Association, former Governor of Oklahoma, and Honorary Chairman of the Bipartisan Policy Center) pointed out in a column in The Wall Street Journal:
"When you become a banker, no one pins a badge on you, nor do you don a judicial robe. So why is the Justice Department telling bankers to act like cops and judges? The Justice Department's new investigation, called 'Operation Choke Point,' demands that banks identify customers who might be breaking the law or just doing things that government officials don't like."
Due to strong opposition from the law, Congress, and institutions, the program was shut down the following year.
Today, the phrase 「Operation Choke Point 2.0」 is sometimes used to refer to the government cutting off banking services to "political enemies and unwelcome tech startups." Or in other words, this term refers to banks "severing relationships with customers deemed politically incorrect, extreme, dangerous, or overstepping." However defined, the term represents an issue affecting both ends of the political spectrum and entities across the political spectrum.
Which Institutions are Involved?
The inner workings of "Choke Point" — as well as any other related or subsequent systemic efforts aimed at depriving specific entities or industries of banking services — were previously unknown, as any investigations (if conducted) were carried out behind closed doors, and Freedom of Information Act requests were pending. However, on December 6, a court filing in such a FOIA case revealed that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) instructed at least one bank (in a letter dated March 11, 2022): "…the FDIC has not yet determined what regulatory paperwork banks engaging in such activities would need, if any. As a result, we respectfully request that you cease all activities related to digital assets." Numerous FDIC letters were submitted as appendices to the filing.
At the same time, it is already known that the original Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force that implemented "Operation Choke Point 1.0" in 2013 included the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) among others. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) — an independent bureau under the U.S. Department of the Treasury — also appears to have been involved, along with the U.S. central bank — the Federal Reserve Board (FRB). The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is also mentioned.
Note: The U.S. government is not the only country to implement debanking policies. Other countries, such as Canada, have also employed such strategies; the UK has also had to investigate complaints about government-led debanking policies.
Why is the Government Doing This? What are the Effects?
Debanking is motivated by various reasons, from combating fraud by payment processors to preventing high-risk businesses from operating, as these businesses may be seen as having more links to money laundering. These reasons are often referred to as "de-risking" rather than "debanking": "Financial institutions terminating or restricting business relationships with broad categories of customers without individually assessing and managing the risks posed by those customers."
In a broader sense, de-risking and debanking can serve as a "partisan tool," choking off legitimate businesses solely for political reasons. Another reason may be that certain government entities wish to have more discretion and power in deciding "where consumers can access loans, financial products, and other banking services and under what circumstances."
It is important to note that the issue does not lie in the performance of a specific government entity's duties. The issue lies in the government's excessive interference with legitimate businesses (or general abuse of power)—with no meaningful due process and no ability to constrain its actions, often carried out behind the scenes. Particularly because there are already enough laws and legal means to regulate businesses for legitimate reasons, such as providing consumer protection, preventing money laundering, and stopping other criminal activities.
The use of debanking strategies can lead to many unforeseen consequences. Even if the aim is truly to protect consumers and the banking system, the results may backfire, hindering consumer choice or causing a chilling effect on the entire industry. These practices also undermine the U.S. government's own policy objectives, as highlighted in the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Report on De-Risking (2023):
· Excluding financial activities from the regulated financial system;
· Obstructing remittances or delaying the smooth transfer of international development funds and humanitarian/disaster relief funds;
· Impeding the effective use of the financial system by low- to middle-income groups and other underserved populations;
· Undermining the central position of the U.S. financial system.
Ultimately, employing a "debanking" strategy could inadvertently punish legitimate businesses and individuals through association. For example, someone may have their previously approved mortgage loan revoked simply because they work for an open-source foundation in the cryptocurrency industry.
For all the reasons mentioned above, many consider the practice of debanking to be "un-American." When debanking indiscriminately targets emerging technologies, it is undoubtedly anti-innovative.
How Widespread Is Debanking?
While we cannot speak for the entire industry or specific interests, as venture capitalists in the cryptocurrency industry, we have witnessed firsthand at least 30 debanking cases occurring in our portfolio companies and founders over the past four years. Coinbase has also publicly stated that they have identified at least "20 instances where the FDIC has requested that a bank 'pause,' 'stop providing,' or 'not continue' providing cryptocurrency banking services."
There may be more cases like this. Due to many entrepreneurs and small businesses being concerned about further retaliation or lacking resources to address the issue, they have been hesitant to come forward, and thus the issue has gone unreported.
For companies in our portfolio, many instances of debanking have occurred with companies that are pre-revenue and pre-token issuance. Their bank accounts have received venture capital funding (provided through institutions like pension funds and university endowments), with these companies using the funds for employee salaries and regular business expenses—just like any other tech startup.
So, what reasons have these companies been given? Whether written or (more commonly) verbal? The stated reasons include "We do not offer cryptocurrency banking services," and more commonly: "Your account has been closed due to compliance-related issues. Please withdraw all funds immediately." These companies have also been informed of this, but have not received specific information on which exact "compliance" issue, nor can they remedy it if one does exist. Finally, other reports we have received from companies include:
· Being informed that "the business compliance back-office team closed the account and prevented us from opening any other account. No other reasons given, and no appeals process provided";
· Being rejected due to "a lack of trust in anyone operating a crypto company";
· Receiving baseless inquiries and notices, bringing costly cycles and undue stress to the startup—already operating lean compared to large companies.
You may also like

2% user contribution, 90% trading volume: The real picture of Polymarket

Trump Can't Take It Anymore, 5 Signals of the US-Iran Ceasefire

Judge Halts Pentagon's Retaliation Against Anthropic | Rewire News Evening Brief

Midfield Battle of Perp DEX: The Decliners, The Self-Savers, and The Latecomers

Iran War Stalemate: What Signal Should the Market Follow?

Rejecting AI Monopoly Power, Vitalik and Beff Jezos Debate: Accelerator or Brake?

Insider Trading Alert! Will Trump Call a Truce by End of April?

After establishing itself as the top tokenized stock, does Ondo have any new highlights?

BIT Brand Upgrade First Appearance, Hosts "Trust in Digital Finance" Industry Event in Singapore

OpenClaw Founder Interview: Why the US Should Learn from China on AI Implementation
WEEX AI Wars II: Enlist as an AI Agent Arsenal and Lead the Battle
Where the thunder of legions falls into a hallowed hush, the true kings of arena are crowned in gold and etched into eternity. Season 1 of WEEX AI Wars has ended, leaving a battlefield of glory. Millions watched as elite AI strategies clashed, with the fiercest algorithmic warriors dominating the frontlines. The echoes of victory still reverberate. Now, the call to arms sounds once more!
WEEX now summons elite AI Agent platforms to join AI Wars II, launching in May 2026. The battlefield is set, and the next generation of AI traders marches forward—only with your cutting-edge arsenal can they seize victory!
Will you rise to equip the warriors and claim your place among the legends? Can your AI Agent technology dominate the battlefield? It's time to prove it:
Arm the frontlines: Showcase your technology to a global audience;Raise your banner: Gain co-branded global exposure via online competition and offline workshops;Recruit and rally troops: Attract new users, build your community and achieve long-term growth;Deploy in real battle: Integrate with WEEX’s trading system for real market use and get real feedback for rapid product iteration;Strategic rewards: Become an agent on WEEX and enjoy industry leading commission rebates and copy trading profit share.Join WEEX AI Wars II now to sound the charge!
Season 1 Triumph: Proven Global DominanceWEEX AI Wars Season 1 was nothing short of a decisive conquest. Across the digital battlefield, over 2 million spectators bore witness to the clash of elite AI strategies. Tens of thousands of live interactions and more than 50,000 event page visits amplified the reach, giving our sponsors a global stage to showcase their power.
Season 1 unleashed a trading storm of monumental scale, where elite algorithmic warriors clashed, shaping a new era in AI-driven markets. $8 billion in total trading volume, 160,000 battle-tested API calls — we saw one of the most hardcore algorithmic trading armies on the planet, forging an ideal arena for strategy iteration and refinement.
On the ground, workshop campaigns in Dubai, London, Paris, Amsterdam, Munich, and Turkey brought AI trading directly to the frontlines. Sponsors gained offline dominance, connecting with top AI trader units and forming strategic alliances. Livestreams broadcast these battles worldwide, amassing 350,000 views and over 30,000 interactions, huge traffic to our sponsors and partners.
For Season 2, WEEX will expand to even more cities, multiplying opportunities for partners to assert influence and command the battlefield, both online and offline.
Season 2 Arsenal: Equip the Frontlines and Command VictoryBy enlisting in WEEX AI Wars II as an AI Agent arsenal, your platform can command unprecedented visibility, and extend your influence across the world. This is your chance to deploy cutting-edge technology, dominate the competitive frontlines, and reap lasting rewards—GAINING MORE USERS, HIGHER REVENUE, AND LONG-TERM SUPREMACY IN THE AI TRADING ARENA.
Reach WEEX’s 8 million userbase and global crypto community. Unleash your potential on a global stage! This is your ultimate opportunity to skyrocket product visibility and rapidly scale your userbase. Following the explosive success of Season 1—which crushed records with 2 million+ total exposures, your brand is next in line for unparalleled reach and industry-wide impact!Test and showcase your AI Agent in real markets. Throw your AI Agents into the ultimate arena! Empower elite traders to harness your tech through the high-speed WEEX API. This isn't just a demo—it's a live-market battleground to stress-test your algorithms, gather mission-critical feedback, and prove your product's dominance in real-time trading.Gain extensive co-branded exposure and traffic support. Command the spotlight! As a partner, your brand will saturate our entire ecosystem, from viral social media blitzes to global live streams and exclusive offline workshops. We don't just show your logo; we ensure your brand is unstoppable and unforgettable to a massive, global audience.Enjoy industry leading rebates. Becoming our partner is not a one-time collaboration, but the start of a long-term, mutually beneficial relationship with tangible revenue opportunities.Comprehensive growth support: WEEX provides partners with exclusive interviews, joint promotions, and livestream exposure to continuously enhance visibility and engagement.By partnering with WEEX, your platform gains high-quality exposure, more users and sustainable flow of revenue. The Hackathon is more than a competition. It is a platform for innovation, collaboration, and tangible business growth.
Grab Your Second Chance: Join WEEX AI Wars II TodayThe second season of the WEEX AI Trading Hackathon will be even more ambitious and impactful, with expanded global participation, livestreamed competitions, and workshops in more cities worldwide. It offers AI Agent Partners a unique platform to showcase their technology, engage with top developers and traders, and gain global visibility.
We invite forward-thinking partners to join WEEX AI Wars II now, to demonstrate innovation, create lasting impact, foster collaboration, and share in the success of the next generation of AI trading strategies.
About WEEXFounded in 2018, WEEX has developed into a global crypto exchange with over 6.2 million users across more than 150 countries. The platform emphasizes security, liquidity, and usability, providing over 1,200 spot trading pairs and offering up to 400x leverage in crypto futures trading. In addition to the traditional spot and derivatives markets, WEEX is expanding rapidly in the AI era — delivering real-time AI news, empowering users with AI trading tools, and exploring innovative trade-to-earn models that make intelligent trading more accessible to everyone. Its 1,000 BTC Protection Fund further strengthens asset safety and transparency, while features such as copy trading and advanced trading tools allow users to follow professional traders and experience a more efficient, intelligent trading journey.
Follow WEEX on social mediaX: @WEEX_Official
Instagram: @WEEX Exchange
Tiktok: @weex_global
Youtube: @WEEX_Official
Discord: WEEX Community
Telegram: WeexGlobal Group

Nasdaq Enters Correction Territory | Rewire News Morning Brief

OpenAI loses to Thousnad-Question, unable to grow a checkout counter in the chatbox

One-Year Valuation Surged 140%, Who Is Signing the Check for Defense AI?

Bittensor vs. Virtuals: Two Distinct AI Flywheel Mechanisms

Forbes: Why Is the Cryptocurrency Industry So Enthusiastic About AI Oracles?

Ethereum Foundation publishes: Restructuring the division of labor between L1 and L2, jointly building the ultimate Ethereum ecosystem

